Skip navigation and jump to content
Welcome to Ireland's Youth Information Website
Follow us
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Snapchat

Accessibility Options

High Contrast Text Size

What students think about the impact of fake news

This SpunOut reader believes that young people need to be made more award of the dangers of fake news in society


Written by SpunOut | View this authors Twitter page and posted in opinion


This is an opinion of a young person and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of SpunOut.ie. It is one person's experience and may be different for you. If you'd like to write something for SpunOut.ie please contact editor@spunout.ie.


Share this article -

For my Leaving Certificate Politics and Society project on fake news and its impact on democratic societies, a classmate and I surveyed 20 students in our school, aged between 13-17, in order to find out where young people source news and if they can distinguish between reliable, fact based information and sensationalised inaccurate information.The three most popular online news sources are The Irish Times, The Lad Bible and the Daily Mail. The survey results revealed some interesting aspects of young people’s media consumption:

  • 60% of students admitted sharing false news online
  • 41% of students have commented on or reported inaccurate information that they have read online in order to expose it
  • 80% of students claimed that they would not release an inaccurate statement online if the benefit of doing so was a gain of followers on their desired social media platform
  • 45% of students said that they rarely check suspicious news material which they see online

This indicates that young people are susceptible to believing false information, but also involved in spreading fake news. The amount of students who remember having shared believable fake news online is worrying, as in our opinion, they represent the presence of a careless culture of internet use. Although obviously a smaller sample, this is a lot more than ‘14% [of American adults] saying they shared a story they knew was fake at the time’.

Another discovery from this survey was that many students have made an effort in the past to comment on, or report, inaccurate information that they have come across in order to condemn or expose it. This shows that nearly half of the participants care enough about the dangers of spreading inaccuracies online to expose them. Although this is a positive discovery, the ideal percent of active commenters should be a lot higher as it should be the responsibility of all citizens to expose information they know, or can prove, to be false. The fact that many students rarely cross check information that they have come across and are skeptical of is not good, because if most people believe things they encounter on the internet despite how suspicious they look, a society of people accepting ‘facts’ without question could be created. This would allow fake news to spread easily, and democracy as a whole will be damaged. 

On a lighter note, the fact that a strong majority of students would not release inaccurate information for the gain of followers on their desired social media platform shows, contrary to the beliefs of many, that young people may not be as obsessed with their social media followings as once thought.

To see whether or not students had been fooled by a common fake news story in the past, a question was asked which showed three pictures of US presidential inaugurations. One was an aerial photo of Trump’s inauguration which showed very few people; one was an aerial photo of Obama’s inauguration which showed a lot of people and one was a photo taken from behind Trump’s inauguration stand which clearly showed him and made it look as though there were a lot of people. This made it seem that the photo taken from behind Trump and the aerial photo of Obama were the same inauguration while the aerial photo of Trump was a different one.

We asked the students which of the three was taken during a separate inauguration to the other two in order to see whether or not they had been fooled by Trump’s framing of the event. 40% of students correctly picked the Obama photo as being taken on a different day, while 60% believed that the aerial photo of Trump was taken on a different day, and no students believed that the framed photo of Trump as being on a different day. This example of the US presidential inaugurations shows how the framing of a photo can fool people and also displays how easy it can be to trick people online for political gain. It goes without saying that Trump heavily endorsed the photo from behind the stage.

It is so important for young people to become more aware of fake news as it will be their future that is affected as social media’s influence grows and grows. The possibility of an Irish election, or the everyday running of Ireland as a state being influenced negatively by fake news is a reality.

Share this article -

Published May 8th2019
Tags fake news democracy online media social media
Can this be improved? Contact editor@spunout.ie if you have any suggestions for this article.

Need more information?

Request to speak with a youth worker in your area over the phone, by email or text. They may be able to assist you by providing further information specific to your needs.

Youth Work Ireland - Crosscare - YMCA

Contact via: Phone E-mail Text
By clicking submit you agree to our terms and conditions. ​Please note that this service is run by Youth Work Ireland and Crosscare​.​ E​nquiries are not handled by SpunOut.ie directly.
Jump to related articles
Was this article helpful?